Bariatric Surgery Calculator

Over the past five years there has been tremendous growth in the development of medical focused mobile applications or "apps" that operate on smartphones and mobile devices. The majority of these apps are patient facing (e.g. fitness applications), few effective physician-patient apps have been developed and effectively utilized in medicine. The use of a physician-patient app is ideally suited in the field of bariatric surgery to ensure the patient and physician understand the relative risk and benefit of surgery. The aim of this project was to develop an iPhone app that provides rapid and convenient access to evidence-based decision-making calculators.

Objective: To construct and validate a scoring system for evidence-based selection of bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures according to severity of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) account for >95% of bariatric procedures in United States in patients with T2DM. To date, there is no validated model to guide procedure selection based on long-term glucose control in patients with T2DM. Methods: A total of 659 patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB and SG at an academic center in the United States and had a minimum 5-year follow-up (2005–2011) were analyzed to generate the model. The validation dataset consisted of 241 patients from an academic center in Spain where similar criteria were applied. Results: At median postoperative follow-up of 7 years (range 5–12), diabetes remission (HbA1C <6.5% off medications) was observed in 49% after RYGB and 28% after SG (P < 0.001). Four independent predictors of long-term remission including preoperative duration of T2DM (P < 0.0001), preoperative number of diabetes medications (P < 0.0001), insulin use (P = 0.002), and glycemic control (HbA1C < 7%) (P = 0.002) were used to develop the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score using a nomogram. Patients were then categorized into 3 stages of diabetes severity. In mild T2DM (IMS score ?25), both procedures significantly improved T2DM. In severe T2DM (IMS score >95), when clinical features suggest limited functional ?-cell reserve, both procedures had similarly low efficacy for diabetes remission. There was an intermediate group, however, in which RYGB was significantly more effective than SG, likely related to its more pronounced neurohormonal effects. Findings were externally validated and procedure recommendations for each severity stage were provided. Conclusions: This is the largest reported cohort (n = 900) with long-term postoperative glycemic follow-up, which, for the first time, categorizes T2DM into 3 validated severity stages for evidence-based procedure selection.